Tag Archive for: Imaging

Celebrating the role of patients in improving radiotherapy services

A new display in Addenbrooke’s Hospital highlights how patients have helped shape radiotherapy treatment.

The multimedia installation in the entrance to the Radiotherapy Department has been produced in partnership with a group of patients, some of whom have shared their experience of radiotherapy treatment.

In 2019 Cambridge was named by Cancer Research UK as one of seven centres of excellence in radiation research. When Rachael Webster, former Senior Radiographer at Addenbrooke’s, heard the good news, her mission was to include patients’ experience and views in the new RadNet Cambridge Centre’s plans to improve radiotherapy for future patients.

She said: “After a chat with one of our patient representatives we thought the best way to get more people involved in radiotherapy research is to celebrate the amazing work from patients and the public over many, many years that has helped shape the radiotherapy services we see today.”

The idea to develop a display about patient involvement in radiotherapy research began a year ago when Rachael put out adverts – at local events, online and via Facebook – inviting people who had experience of radiotherapy to be involved in a creative project.

Rachael soon assembled a group of nine patients and members of the public who were keen to be involved.

Jemma Chapman (Head of Radiotherapy), Rachael Webster (Senior Radiographer), Charlotte Coles (CRUK RadNet Cambridge Lead)

“Involving patients was the goal from the very beginning, we need to hear the patients’ voices to celebrate the patients’ voices,” she explained.

“There are a lot of misconceptions and fears about radiotherapy, especially from the past. We know radiotherapy is a safe, accurate and effective treatment for many cancers and around 50% of patients will received radiotherapy as a part of their treatment.”

Over the course of the year, the patient and public involvement group met with researchers, radiographers and designers to share the questions and concerns they had before they started their treatment, and to reflect on their honest experiences of undergoing radiotherapy.

People joined the group for different reasons. Neil said: “I wanted to be involved in the project so that I could help to promote the modern science of radiotherapy and how it can benefit patients.”

Beverly wanted to help others facing treatment, adding: “I feel more knowledgeable, more comfortable and I feel quite an advocate for helping people to feel the same. It was a way of giving something back that felt really important to me.”

And Caroline valued the opportunity to get involved, explaining: “Knowing that there was a way to make your voice heard and a way you can make a difference for other people was very empowering for me.”

The resulting display is based around a timeline illustrating how key advances in radiation research, patient participation in radiotherapy clinical trials and patient campaign groups have shaped the service today. Along the wall are QR codes for people to download podcasts and videos to hear more about radiotherapy techniques and the patients’ experiences.

The display also highlights pioneering radiotherapy research in Cambridge to target treatment more accurately and reduce long-term side effects that affect patients’ quality of life. A clinical trial in Cambridge of over a thousand patients proved the benefits of using a more targeted radiotherapy technique, called Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), for early-stage breast cancer and provided evidence to help IMRT become a standard of care.

Professor Charlotte Coles, RadNet Cambridge Lead and NIHR Cambridge BRC researcher, said: “I am thrilled to see this display showcasing the invaluable and essential contribution patients make by actively shaping as well as participating in radiotherapy research. I hope that conveying the incredible advances in radiotherapy research in such an accessible and relatable way will give patients and families added confidence in their radiotherapy and inspire them to get involved in research.”

The RadNet Cambridge team are keen to involve more patients, particularly those in under-represented groups, to share their experiences and to guide future research projects and clinical trials. Amy, one of the patients in the group, said: “My message to those who are approached to participate in a project like this, or to participate in some of these research projects, is that we need to be in it to influence it.”

The project has been funded by Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust with additional funding and support from RadNet Cambridge and the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre.

Cambridge researchers awarded Fellow status

Congratulations to our NIHR Cambridge BRC researchers who have been elected as Fellows of the Academy of Medical Sciences.

In 2022, 60 Fellows have been elected for their contributions to biomedical and health science, the highest number elected into the academy in a single year.

The Academy of Medical Sciences aims to advance biomedical and health research and its translation into benefits to society. Fellows are selected from laboratory science, clinical academic medicine, veterinary science, dentistry, medical and nursing care, and other professions allied to medical science including ethics, social science and law.

Prof Miles Parkes

Professor Miles Parkes, director of the NIHR Cambridge BRC and one of our newly elected Fellows said: “I feel very honoured to have been elected as a fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences and am very grateful both to the colleagues who nominated and supported my application and the many patients and collaborators across who have played a critical role in the success of our IBD research.”

Professor Fiona Gilbert - Imaging theme lead

Professor Fiona Gilbert, Imaging Lead at NIHR Cambridge BRC and newly awarded Fellow said: “Our work here on the Cambridge biomedical campus brings together clinical teams, research and patients, enabling pioneering working in so many fields of medicine and life science.”

Cambridge researchers elected as Fellows

Professor Miles Parkes, Consultant Gastroenterologist and Director, Addenbrooke’s Hospital NIHR Cambridge BRC director

Professor Fiona Gilbert, Head of the Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge BRC Imaging Theme Lead

Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Professor of Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge BRC researcher

Professor David Savage, Professor of Molecular Metabolism, University of Cambridge NIHR Cambridge BRC researcher

Professor Rodrigo Floto, Professor of Respiratory Biology, University of Cambridge

Dr John Marioni, Senior Group Leader, University of Cambridge

Professor Susan Ozanne, Professor of Developmental Endocrinology, University of Cambridge

Professor Anna Philpott, Head of the School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge

Consensus opens door to worldwide improvements in breast cancer radiotherapy treatment

A panel of European experts and patients has identified a way to achieve major changes in the way radiotherapy treatment for breast cancer patients is delivered around the world.

The Consensus from ESTROACROP: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology – Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice, which has been published online by Lancet Oncology, states that 3-week breast radiotherapy can be offered to any patient for any indication and 1-week breast radiotherapy can be offered for patients who do not need lymph node radiotherapy.

It follows months of work from the panel. They first looked at research on increased doses of radiation over a shorter timeframe (called hypofractionation), and then compiled consensus statements.

These were reviewed by experts from hospitals across Europe, Brazil and Israel, who graded how much they either agreed or disagreed with the statements.

Finally, the panel selected the statements that scored the highest and agreed a formal Consensus.

Professor Charlotte Coles, who is also an NIHR Research Professor, Deputy Head of the Department of Oncology at the University of Cambridge and a member of the core ESTRO-ACROP consensus group, said: “In the clinical world Consensus statements can drive change – so this really is the next step to changing standard of care in Europe and the rest of the world.

“We knew the evidence was there to support hypofractionation – there have been some excellent clinical trials over the last couple of decades. These include the recent UK FAST-Forward trial that showed that 1-week breast radiotherapy is at least as good as conventional treatment in preventing cancer returning with similar side effects, but has far fewer treatment visits for patients.”

Hypofractionation is already standard of care in the UK, but it has been much slower to implement elsewhere. In addition, there are huge areas of the world, for example in parts of Africa, where access to radiotherapy treatment is extremely poor.

Professor Coles said: “Changing from three or even five weeks in some places to one week will make breast radiotherapy treatment a realistic goal for everyone who needs it.

“There are other benefits too, including less travel for treatment, less time off work, less time in recovery.

“What the Consensus is saying is that doctors could treat three breast cancer patients in the time that it used to take to treat just one, which would mean more patients could access breast radiotherapy.

“The good things about reducing the number of weeks is we’re not giving less treatment, it’s the same treatment only over one week, in more concentrated doses.

“The science behind it is based on how breast cancer reacts to hypofractionation, and it’s a happy consequence that it’s also quicker and cheaper.”

Professor Coles is delighted that the Consensus will be published in Lancet Oncology: “This is the first time that a consensus or guideline from ESTRO-ACROP has been published in a high-impact journal like Lancet Oncology.

“This will help us enormously in our work to influence policy makers to ensure equity of access to evidence-based radiotherapy.

“We know Consensus statements drive change but in many places health care providers are still reimbursed for each dose they deliver and not for the whole course. This is a disincentive for providing evidence-based hypofractionation and needs to be changed.

“We want equity so that everyone can access the radiotherapy they need and for providers to be incentivised by the quality of the radiotherapy they deliver rather than the number of treatments so that the patient experience is better.

“I am currently chairing The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission, which will look at reimbursement as part of its remit. We hope this Consensus will convince policy-makers of the health and economic value of breast hypofractionation.

“The ultimate goal is to make high-quality breast cancer radiotherapy accessible for everyone, no matter where they live.

“We’ve already changed practice in the UK, we now need to change it internationally.”

  • “European Society for Radiotherapy and consensus recommendations on patient selection and dose and fractionation for external beam radiation therapy in early breast cancer” will appear in print in Lancet Oncology in January 2022.

Scientists identify the cause of Alzheimer’s progression in the brain

Cambridge researchers have used human data to measure the speed of different processes that lead to Alzheimer’s disease and found that it develops in a very different way than previously thought. The results could help researchers to develop new treatments.

An international research team, led by the University of Cambridge and supported by the NIHR Cambridge BRC, found that Alzheimer’s disease starts in multiple, different regions of the brain, rather than from a single point which then spreads elsewhere. How quickly the disease kills cells in these regions determines how quickly the disease progresses overall.

The researchers used post-mortem brain samples from Alzheimer’s patients, as well as brain PET scans from living patients with a range of cognitive impairment, from mild impairment through to those with late-stage Alzheimer’s disease. The researchers used the samples and scans to track how a protein called tau (one of two key proteins thought to cause the condition) formed into clumps called ‘aggregates’.

In Alzheimer’s disease, tau and another protein called amyloid-beta, build up into tangles and plaques (clumps) – aggregates – causing brain cells to die and the brain to shrink. This results in memory loss, personality changes and difficulty carrying out daily tasks. For many years, the processes within the brain which result in Alzheimer’s disease have been described using terms like ‘cascade’ and ‘chain reaction’. It is a difficult disease to study, since it develops over decades, and a definitive diagnosis can only be given following examination of samples of brain tissue after death.

However, by combining five different datasets and applying them to the same mathematical model, the researchers observed that the speed at which aggregates multiply in individual regions of the brain determines the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, rather than aggregates spreading from one region to another.

“The thinking had been that Alzheimer’s develops in a way that’s similar to many cancers: the aggregates form in one region and then spread through the brain,” said Dr Georg Meisl from Cambridge’s Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, the paper’s first author. “But instead, we found that when Alzheimer’s starts there are already aggregates in multiple regions of the brain, and so trying to stop the spread between regions will do little to slow the disease.”

The results, reported in the journal Science Advances, open up new ways of understanding the progress of Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases, and new ways that future treatments might be developed.

This is the first time that human data has been used to understand the development of Alzheimer’s disease over time. It was made possible in part by approaches developed in Cambridge over the last decade, which allowed the modelling of protein aggregation and spread in the brain, as well as advances in PET scanning and improvements in the sensitivity of other brain measurements.

“This research shows the value of working with human data instead of imperfect animal models,” said co-senior author Professor Tuomas Knowles, also from the Department of Chemistry. “It’s exciting to see the progress in this field – fifteen years ago, the basic molecular mechanisms were determined for simple systems in a test tube by us and others; but now we’re able to study this process at the molecular level in real patients, which is an important step to one day developing treatments.”

The researchers found that tau aggregates multiply slower than expected – taking up to five years. “Neurons are surprisingly good at stopping aggregates from forming, but we need to find ways to make them even better if we’re going to develop an effective treatment,” said co-senior author Professor Sir David Klenerman, from the UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge. “It’s fascinating how biology has evolved to stop the aggregation of proteins.

“The work allows us to determine the rate limiting molecular step in the development and spread of tau aggregate through the brain and hence should be targeted for an effective therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. In future it also might allow the effectiveness of a potential treatment to be measured by analysing the changes in PET signal over time using the model we have developed,” Professor Sir David Klenerman added.

The researchers say their research could be used to help the development of treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, which affects an estimated 44 million people worldwide, by targeting the most important processes that occur when humans develop the disease. It could also be applied to other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease.  

“The key discovery is that stopping the replication of aggregates rather than their propagation is going to be more effective at the stages of the disease that we studied,” said Knowles.

The researchers are now planning to look earlier in the development of the disease, and extend the studies to other diseases such as Frontal temporal dementia, traumatic brain injury and progressive supranuclear palsy where tau aggregates are also formed during disease.

The study is a collaboration between researchers at the UK Dementia Research Institute, the University of Cambridge and Harvard Medical School. Funding is acknowledged from Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, the European Research Council, the Royal Society, JPB Foundation, the Rainwater Foundation, the NIH, and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, which supports the Cambridge Brain Bank.

To read the full paper:

Georg Meisl et al.
In vivo rate-determining steps of tau seed accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease.’ Science Advances (2021).
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abh1448

© Copyright - NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre 2025